🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many federal defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.